Jan 6, 2010

Posted by Keenan "SuperMario290" in Companies, Computers, PC | 0 comments

Mad Catz makes gaming mice out of rats

c users rneville desktop fi 585x355 Mad Catz makes gaming mice out of ratsOkay, Mad Catz doesn’t really make their computer mice out of rats. But they are releasing a new line of mice for you hardcore super fucking hardcore PC gamers that have the cash to drop on a fancy mouse, then you might like the Cyborg R.A.T. Sounds scary, but looks damn sexy.

The selling quotes for this fancy device? Well there’s the “key points of contact between the gamer’s hand and the mouse are fully adjustable”, as well as the mouse being able to be “customized for any grip preference”. Sounds good, and the price point doesn’t sound too bad compared to others, ranging from $49.99 to $129.99.

Sounds really, looks damn beautiful, but I don’t have a PC that can play Team Fortress 2 let alone do anything worth of using that mouse, and I don’t have that kinda cash flow right now. Click the link at the top to see full specifications of each different skew of the mice.

Read More
Oct 29, 2009

Posted by Sid982 in Computers | 0 comments

Steam Sale

team fortress 2 preview1 Steam Sale

Valve is selling Team Fortress 2 on Steam for $2.49. The only catch is you have to buy it before 2:00 PM PDT and no I don’t know when that is. This is probably the cheapest chance to buy Team Fortress 2 if you don’t already have it, so get buying.

Read More
Aug 11, 2009

Posted by Oculin in Computers, Gaming in General | 0 comments

John Carmack Says We Are Hitting Physical Limits On Hardware

john Carmack working John Carmack Says We Are Hitting Physical Limits On Hardware

Most of the video game industry’s life, hardware has always focused on better hardware and increased performance, but according to John Carmack of ID software we are hitting a wall when it comes to hardware.

“We talk about these absurd things like how many teraflops of processing and memory that are going into our game machines,” Carmack said after carmack predicted that Next gen consoles will have  at least 2 GB of Internal RAM “… although interestingly we are coasting towards some fundamental physical limits on things. We’ve already hit the megahertz wall and eventually there’s going to be a power density wall from which you won’t get more processing out there…”

While we may be hitting physical limits on hardware he mentions that developers can turn to other directions to improve performance.

“There’ll be questions of whether we shift to a cloud computing infrastructure… lots of interesting questions about whether you have the computing power in your living room versus somewhere else…”

There are sure to be advances still for gaming, we may just have to think differently on how to approach it.

Link

Read More
Jul 8, 2009

Posted by Chris Luzader in Computers, Other News | 0 comments

Google Drops the Ultimate Bomb on Microsoft: the Google Chrome Operating System

googlechromelogo Google Drops the Ultimate Bomb on Microsoft: the Google Chrome Operating SystemGoogle ’s always been in heated competition with Microsoft. We thought that the competition was becoming hot again when the company behind the dominant Windows OS launched their new search engine, Bing with much fanfare. But that may be nothing compared to the bombshell Google just dropped. Google announced on their blog tonight that they’re releasing an operating system: Google Chrome OS. While the company already has a mobile operating system in Android, this new one will be based off of Google Chrome, Google’s web browser.

Just after we heard a number of rumors about the possible arrival of the rumored Google OS tonight, Google actually went ahead and announced (official Google Blog post) that it will indeed release its own operating system – the Google Chrome Operating System. For now, Google plans to aim this OS at the netbook market. The new, Chrome-like OS will only become available for consumers in the second half of 2010, but Google promises that  it’ll be an open source (”later this year”), lightweight platform that can “power computers ranging from small netbooks to full-size desktop systems.” According the the announcement on the Google blog,  the OS will run on standard x86 chips (that includes Intel Atom) as well as ARM chips, and Google is already working with a number of OEMs to bring devices that run the Google Chrome OS to the market.

Google Chrome OS is Not Android

In the announcement, Google stresses that this operating system is a completely new project and not affiliated with Google’s Android OS, which, according to Google, was always meant to run on a variety of devices, including netbooks. (”Google Chrome OS is a new project, separate from Android. Android was designed from the beginning to work across a variety of devices from phones to set-top boxes to netbooks. Google Chrome OS is being created for people who spend most of their time on the web, and is being designed to power computers ranging from small netbooks to full-size desktop systems.“) Google acknowledges that the two operating systems might overlap in some areas, but the company believes that, ultimately, “choice will drive innovation for the benefit of everyone, including Google.”

Here is how Google describes the OS:

Speed, simplicity and security are the key aspects of Google Chrome OS. We’re designing the OS to be fast and lightweight, to start up and get you onto the web in a few seconds. The user interface is minimal to stay out of your way, and most of the user experience takes place on the web. And as we did for the Google Chrome browser, we are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don’t have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates. It should just work.

The Google Chrome OS will run on top of a Linux kernel, though the exact details about the actual implementation are still vague.

Perfect for Netbooks

This kind of operating system would obviously be perfect for netbooks, which, after all, are meant to be constantly connected to the Internet and don’t have a lot of resources. Currently, most netbooks run Windows XP, which, by now, is a rather antiquated operating system. With Windows 7, Microsoft tried to release a version for netbooks that would only run three applications at the same time (though Microsoft has since dropped this limit). Maybe Google is going to take this even further and will release an OS that will only run one application – Chrome.

With this, Google can obviously put its own web apps like Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Docs at the center of the user experience, and this is surely part of Google’s motivation behind releasing this OS. But given that Chrome is simply a browser, any other web app would obviously also be able to run on it as well.

-

But let’s be clear on what this really is. This is Google dropping the mother of bombs on its chief rival, Microsoft. It even says as much in the first paragraph of its post, “However, the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web.” Yeah, who do you think they mean by that?

And it’s a genius play. So many people are buying netbooks right now, but are running WIndows XP on them. Windows XP is 8 years old. It was built to run on Pentium IIIs and Pentium 4s. Google Chrome OS is built to run on both x86 architecture chips and ARM chips, like the ones increasingly found in netbooks. It is also working with multiple OEMs to get the new OS up and running next year.

Obviously, this Chrome OS will be lightweight and fast just like the browser itself. But also just like the browser, it will be open-sourced. Think Microsoft will be open-sourcing Windows anytime soon?

As Google writes, “We have a lot of work to do, and we’re definitely going to need a lot of help from the open source community to accomplish this vision.” They might as well set up enlistment booths on college campuses for their war against Microsoft.

Google says the software architecture will basically be the current Chrome browser running inside “a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel.” So in other words, it basically is the web as an OS. And applications developers will develop for it just as they would on the web. This is similar to the approach Palm has taken with its new webOS for the Palm Pre, but Google notes that any app developed for Google Chrome OS will work in any standards-compliant browser on any OS.

What Google is doing is not recreating a new kind of OS, they’re creating the best way to not need one at all.

So why release this new OS instead of using Android? After all, it has already been successfully ported to netbooks. Google admits that there is some overlap there. But a key difference they don’t mention is the ability to run on the x86 architecture. Android cannot do that, Chrome OS can and will. But more, Google wants to emphasize that Chrome OS is all about the web, whereas Android is about a lot of different things. Including apps that are not standard browser-based web apps.

But Chrome OS will be all about the web apps. And no doubt HTML 5 is going to be a huge part of all of this. A lot of people are still wary about running web apps for when their computer isn’t connected to the web. But HTML 5 has the potential to change that, as you’ll be able to work in the browser even when not connected, and upload when you are again.

We’re starting to see more clearly why Google’s Vic Gundotra was pushing HTML 5 so hard at Google I/O this year. Sure, part of it was about things like Google Wave, but Google Wave is just one of many new-style apps in this new Chrome OS universe.

But there is a wild card is all of this still for Microsoft: Windows 7. While Windows XP is 8 years old, and Windows Vista is just generally considered to be a bad OS for netbooks, Windows 7 could offer a good netbook experience. And Microsoft had better hope so, or its claim that 96% of netbooks run Windows is going to be very different in a year.

Google plans to release the open source code for Chrome OS later this year ahead of the launch next year. Don’t be surprised if this code drops around the same time as Windows 7. Can’t wait to hear what Microsoft will have to say about all of this!

Conclusion

The Google Chrome Operating System is designed to be a lightweight system, just like the Chrome browser. Unfortunately, Google didn’t divulge many other details, and it will be a while until anyone gets their hands on it. Clearly though, Google’s setting the stage for a major battle with Microsoft. Just as Microsoft is trying to break Google’s stranglehold on the search engine market, Google may be trying to do the same with the Windows-controlled OS market. Oh, and one other thing: How will Apple respond to this?

-

Read the entire official blog post by Google.

 Google Drops the Ultimate Bomb on Microsoft: the Google Chrome Operating System

 Google Drops the Ultimate Bomb on Microsoft: the Google Chrome Operating System

Read More
Jun 28, 2009

Posted by Keenan "SuperMario290" in Computers | 0 comments

Want a Cheap Netbook? Don’t ask Sony!

news1 1 Want a Cheap Netbook? Dont ask Sony! When you think of Netbook’s, you generally think of a cheap, maybe $200 or $300 computer that has all of the essentials, but not overloaded with stuff. Well, Sony is taking that and shoving it in your ass with the Vaio P. The Vaio P NETBOOK costs an amazing $2,000. Not $1,000, or even $1,500, but $2,000 freaking dollars. Crazy.

Apparently, this price is because the Vaio P is some special edition, but I mean the regular Vaio P only cocsts $1,000. I mean, talk about a charging out the ass for a freaking netbook. :|

Read More
Jun 17, 2009

Posted by Chris Luzader in Companies, Computers, Other News | 0 comments

Google Considers Request by Many to Increase Privacy

google logo 1024x408 Google Considers Request by Many to Increase Privacy

More than three dozen security and privacy advocates and researchers are asking Google to offer better data protection for users of Gmail and other Google apps and Google said on Tuesday that it is considering doing that, if it doesn’t slow down the apps too much.

You may not know this but you can set Gmail to encrypt your session data by default (I recommend to do it!) to protect it from being sniffed over the network. However, Google doesn’t offer the ability to encrypt potentially sensitive data created in other Google apps like Docs or Calendar by default, which means the communications could be stolen or snooped on by someone using a packet sniffer on public Internet connections, such as open wireless networks, according to the letter addressed to Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt and signed by a who’s who of 38 experts in the security industry.

Granted, users of other free e-mail services, social networks, and many other sites are vulnerable to data theft and account hijacking, the letter notes. But Google is in a position to set a standard for others to follow, it says.

Google should enable HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure), a technology used by banks and e-commerce sites, by default for Gmail, Docs and Calendar, or at least do more to educate users about the privacy risks and make it easy to turn on the HTTPS by default, the letter urges.

Not only do many people not understand the privacy risks in using unencrypted services, but they don’t know that they have the HTTPS default option and finding the settings to change isn’t that easy, the letter says. Users can access Gmail, Docs, Calendar and other apps via HTTPS by simply changing the “http://” in the URL address to “https://,” but many don’t know about that option, either. I recommend that you select the option to use HTTPS immediately (I use it!)!

“As a market leader in providing cloud services, Google has an opportunity to engage in genuine privacy and security leadership, and to set a standard for the industry,” the letter says. “If Google believes that encryption and protection from hackers is a choice that should be left up to users, the company must do a better job of informing them of the risks so that they are equipped to make this choice.”

Some of the security experts endorsing the document include Bruce Schneier, chief security technology officer of BT Group; Peter Neumann, principal scientist at SRI International; encryption pioneer Ron Rivest of MIT; Steve Bellovin of Columbia University; Eugene Spafford at Purdue University; and DEFCON founder Jeff Moss, who recently joined the Homeland Security Advisory Council.

In response, Alma Whitten, a software engineer on Google’s security and privacy teams, wrote in a blog post that Google has been “looking into whether it would make sense to turn on HTTPS as the default for all Gmail users.

“But we want to more completely understand the impact on people’s experience, analyze the data, and make sure there are no negative effects,” she wrote. “Ideally we’d like this to be on by default for all connections, and we’re investigating the trade-offs, since there are some downsides to HTTPS–in some cases it makes certain actions slower.”

Google is planning to test the use of HTTPS with “small samples of different types of Gmail users” to see whether it affects the performance of their e-mail, the blog post says.

“Unless there are negative effects on the user experience or it’s otherwise impractical, we intend to turn on HTTPS by default more broadly, hopefully for all Gmail users,” the post says. “We’re also considering how to make this work best for other apps including Google Docs and Google Calendar.”

The letter addresses the performance trade-off argument, noting that Google seems to have solved the issue because it provides access to its advertising systems and several other services only via HTTPS sessions.

“Google’s engineers have created a low-latency, enjoyable experience for users of Health, Voice, AdWords and AdSense–we are confident that these same skilled engineers can make any necessary tweaks to make Gmail, Docs, and Calendar work equally well in order to enable encryption by default,” the letter says.

So, are you going to use HTTPS by default, or just HTTP, or what? Leave your answer in the comments!

Read More
Jun 16, 2009

Posted by Chris Luzader in Companies, Computers, Other News | 0 comments

Facebook Faces Trouble With Vanity Names

With more than 200 million registered users, Facebook has become one of the most important web properties and it was clear that vanity user page names, instead of cryptic number codes, would cause a rush among the user base.

According to Facebook, more than 500,000 names were claimed within the first fifteen minutes of launch on June 13, 12:01 AM EDT. The number topped one million within the first hour. By Sunday morning, more than three million names were gone.

Facebook’s offer was limited to personal accounts as well as group and fan pages with at least 1000 members as of May 31, 2009 to prevent cyber-squatting. All pages created after May 31, 2009 or that had less than 1000 fans on that day will be eligible to claim usernames on Sunday, June 28, 2009, the company said.

Users who changed their original page link to a vanity name link are stuck with that name/link, as Facebook said a change or transfer is no longer possible.

Lawyers apparently are already getting into gear to see whether there may be a lawsuit possible against Facebook. Cyber-squatting is the main concern. Attorneys Lynn Humphreys and Cathleen Stadecker said that companies or groups with trademarked names can block squatters and interlopers from using their brands by following online registration protocols that Facebook has set up, but they also stated that “It remains to be seen exactly how Facebook will evaluate the validity of particular requests for protection.”

Facebook has published an automated IP infringement form, which individuals, businesses and other organizations can use to request removal of a user name.

While they recognize that Facebook “explicitly reserved the right to remove and/or reclaim any user name at any time, for any reason,” they also stated that all is “all well and good”, but add that it remains unclear “how individual infringement claims relating to user names will be processed and resolved.”

Smells like a lawsuit to me.

How about you?

Read More
Jun 9, 2009

Posted by Chris Luzader in Computers, Other News | 2 comments

Wolfram|Alpha Releases its First Major Update

Wolfram Alpha Logo

Here’s another thing that’ll make Wolfram|Alpha more fun than Google’s updates. When some aspect of Google’s search gets updated, we don’t necessarily notice it, and it’s not usually easy to make an ordered list of the exact updates that happened. However, Wolfram Alpha is not a search engine, it’s a computational knowledge engine; it only handles the data that was fed to it, and thus its data set (and the algorithms for its manipulation) will get updated every once in a while.

The list of changes and improvements is quite long. Here it is in its entirety:

  • Additional linguistic forms for many types of data and questions
  • More comparisons of composite properties (e.g. “US military vs. UK”)
  • Combined time series plots of different quantities (e.g. “germany gdp vs population”)
  • More complete handling of government positions (e.g. “chancellor”, etc.)
  • Updates to country borders for India, China, Slovenia, Croatia, and others
  • Updates to naming for certain politically sensitive countries and regions
  • Additional subcountry regions (e.g. “Wales”); many more to come
  • Additional support for current and past fractional timezones (e.g. “Iran time”)
  • City-by-city handling of U.S. states with multiple timezones
  • Updates to certain European currencies (e.g. for “Cyprus” and “Slovakia”)
  • Some additional historical events; many more to come
  • Additional probability computations for cards and coins (e.g. “2 or 3 aces”)
  • Additional output for partitions of integers (e.g. “partitions of 47″)
  • Implicit handling of geometric figure properties (e.g. “ellipse with area 6 and major axis 2″)
  • Additional support for Mathematica 3D graphics syntax
  • Additional support for stock prices with explicit dates
  • Support for planet-to-planet distances and “nearest planet”, etc.
  • Extra information when comparing incompatible units (e.g. “ergs vs. newtons”)
  • Improved linguistic handling for many foods (e.g. “love apple”)
  • More mountains added, especially in Australia
  • Support for many less-common given names (e.g. “zebulon”)
  • More “self-aware” questions answered (e.g. “how old are you”)
  • More consistent handling of sidebar links to Wikipedia, etc.

(Wolfram|Alpha will be “Preview Testing” these features “as early as tomorrow.” You can be the first to try out the update by going here. You can read the full blog post by the Official Wolfram|Alpha Blog here.)

Out of these, the first one is probably most important: the fact that Wolfram Alpha now understands more linguistic forms means it’ll understand you better, and thus provide better results overall. Also, the fact that Wolfram Alpha now answers more self-aware questions probably means there will be another list of Wolfram Alpha easter eggs for you; if you’ve missed the first three lists, here they are (courtesy of Mashable!):

Read More
Jun 9, 2009

Posted by Chris Luzader in Computers, Other News, WTF | 5 comments

Thousands of Children Injured by Computers Each Year, Study Shows

Computers, reports the BBC this morning, are apparently VERY dangerous to children. Not because of online predators, brain rot, or decreasing attention spans, but, according to a new study appearing in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, because of kids physically hurting themselves near their home offices. http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41725000/jpg/_41725936_computer_boy203.jpg

In what seems to be painfully obvious, researchers at Nationwide Children’s Hospital Center for Injury Research and Policy in Columbus, Ohio say that acute computer-related injuries are preventable. How? Don’t let children run around computers. As you would with any electrical device, keep open beverage containers at a safe distance. Place monitors in safe, properly stowed positions. If you are carrying a computer, don’t rush. And make sure to get those easily tripped-over cables out of the way.

While all of that may be common sense for most computer-using individuals, the report cites that over 78,000 patients were treated for computer-related injuries in U.S. hospitals from 1994 to 2006. In 2002, for instance, over 30-percent of those injuries were sustained by children under 15.

Though that statistic seems high, almost every American household has a computer, so it would make sense that household-related injuries — kitchen fires, falling down stairs, power tool accidents in the garage — would include the nefarious computer, as well.

All this seems VERY obvious to me: “Keep open beverage containers at a safe distance.” “Don’t let children run around computer.”

How about you? Leave a comment!

Read More
Jun 9, 2009

Posted by Chris Luzader in Computers, WTF | 5 comments

G33k Picture of the Day: Lucky Fox

http://www.realgeek.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/firefox-logo.jpg

Firefox, anyone? Need I say more? I’ll let you people just marvel at that picture for a while…

Read More
Page 1 of 2481234567891020...Last »