Jul 8, 2009

Posted by Chris Luzader in Computers, Other News | 0 comments

Google Drops the Ultimate Bomb on Microsoft: the Google Chrome Operating System

googlechromelogo Google Drops the Ultimate Bomb on Microsoft: the Google Chrome Operating SystemGoogle ’s always been in heated competition with Microsoft. We thought that the competition was becoming hot again when the company behind the dominant Windows OS launched their new search engine, Bing with much fanfare. But that may be nothing compared to the bombshell Google just dropped. Google announced on their blog tonight that they’re releasing an operating system: Google Chrome OS. While the company already has a mobile operating system in Android, this new one will be based off of Google Chrome, Google’s web browser.

Just after we heard a number of rumors about the possible arrival of the rumored Google OS tonight, Google actually went ahead and announced (official Google Blog post) that it will indeed release its own operating system – the Google Chrome Operating System. For now, Google plans to aim this OS at the netbook market. The new, Chrome-like OS will only become available for consumers in the second half of 2010, but Google promises that  it’ll be an open source (”later this year”), lightweight platform that can “power computers ranging from small netbooks to full-size desktop systems.” According the the announcement on the Google blog,  the OS will run on standard x86 chips (that includes Intel Atom) as well as ARM chips, and Google is already working with a number of OEMs to bring devices that run the Google Chrome OS to the market.

Google Chrome OS is Not Android

In the announcement, Google stresses that this operating system is a completely new project and not affiliated with Google’s Android OS, which, according to Google, was always meant to run on a variety of devices, including netbooks. (”Google Chrome OS is a new project, separate from Android. Android was designed from the beginning to work across a variety of devices from phones to set-top boxes to netbooks. Google Chrome OS is being created for people who spend most of their time on the web, and is being designed to power computers ranging from small netbooks to full-size desktop systems.“) Google acknowledges that the two operating systems might overlap in some areas, but the company believes that, ultimately, “choice will drive innovation for the benefit of everyone, including Google.”

Here is how Google describes the OS:

Speed, simplicity and security are the key aspects of Google Chrome OS. We’re designing the OS to be fast and lightweight, to start up and get you onto the web in a few seconds. The user interface is minimal to stay out of your way, and most of the user experience takes place on the web. And as we did for the Google Chrome browser, we are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don’t have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates. It should just work.

The Google Chrome OS will run on top of a Linux kernel, though the exact details about the actual implementation are still vague.

Perfect for Netbooks

This kind of operating system would obviously be perfect for netbooks, which, after all, are meant to be constantly connected to the Internet and don’t have a lot of resources. Currently, most netbooks run Windows XP, which, by now, is a rather antiquated operating system. With Windows 7, Microsoft tried to release a version for netbooks that would only run three applications at the same time (though Microsoft has since dropped this limit). Maybe Google is going to take this even further and will release an OS that will only run one application – Chrome.

With this, Google can obviously put its own web apps like Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Docs at the center of the user experience, and this is surely part of Google’s motivation behind releasing this OS. But given that Chrome is simply a browser, any other web app would obviously also be able to run on it as well.

-

But let’s be clear on what this really is. This is Google dropping the mother of bombs on its chief rival, Microsoft. It even says as much in the first paragraph of its post, “However, the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web.” Yeah, who do you think they mean by that?

And it’s a genius play. So many people are buying netbooks right now, but are running WIndows XP on them. Windows XP is 8 years old. It was built to run on Pentium IIIs and Pentium 4s. Google Chrome OS is built to run on both x86 architecture chips and ARM chips, like the ones increasingly found in netbooks. It is also working with multiple OEMs to get the new OS up and running next year.

Obviously, this Chrome OS will be lightweight and fast just like the browser itself. But also just like the browser, it will be open-sourced. Think Microsoft will be open-sourcing Windows anytime soon?

As Google writes, “We have a lot of work to do, and we’re definitely going to need a lot of help from the open source community to accomplish this vision.” They might as well set up enlistment booths on college campuses for their war against Microsoft.

Google says the software architecture will basically be the current Chrome browser running inside “a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel.” So in other words, it basically is the web as an OS. And applications developers will develop for it just as they would on the web. This is similar to the approach Palm has taken with its new webOS for the Palm Pre, but Google notes that any app developed for Google Chrome OS will work in any standards-compliant browser on any OS.

What Google is doing is not recreating a new kind of OS, they’re creating the best way to not need one at all.

So why release this new OS instead of using Android? After all, it has already been successfully ported to netbooks. Google admits that there is some overlap there. But a key difference they don’t mention is the ability to run on the x86 architecture. Android cannot do that, Chrome OS can and will. But more, Google wants to emphasize that Chrome OS is all about the web, whereas Android is about a lot of different things. Including apps that are not standard browser-based web apps.

But Chrome OS will be all about the web apps. And no doubt HTML 5 is going to be a huge part of all of this. A lot of people are still wary about running web apps for when their computer isn’t connected to the web. But HTML 5 has the potential to change that, as you’ll be able to work in the browser even when not connected, and upload when you are again.

We’re starting to see more clearly why Google’s Vic Gundotra was pushing HTML 5 so hard at Google I/O this year. Sure, part of it was about things like Google Wave, but Google Wave is just one of many new-style apps in this new Chrome OS universe.

But there is a wild card is all of this still for Microsoft: Windows 7. While Windows XP is 8 years old, and Windows Vista is just generally considered to be a bad OS for netbooks, Windows 7 could offer a good netbook experience. And Microsoft had better hope so, or its claim that 96% of netbooks run Windows is going to be very different in a year.

Google plans to release the open source code for Chrome OS later this year ahead of the launch next year. Don’t be surprised if this code drops around the same time as Windows 7. Can’t wait to hear what Microsoft will have to say about all of this!

Conclusion

The Google Chrome Operating System is designed to be a lightweight system, just like the Chrome browser. Unfortunately, Google didn’t divulge many other details, and it will be a while until anyone gets their hands on it. Clearly though, Google’s setting the stage for a major battle with Microsoft. Just as Microsoft is trying to break Google’s stranglehold on the search engine market, Google may be trying to do the same with the Windows-controlled OS market. Oh, and one other thing: How will Apple respond to this?

-

Read the entire official blog post by Google.

 Google Drops the Ultimate Bomb on Microsoft: the Google Chrome Operating System

 Google Drops the Ultimate Bomb on Microsoft: the Google Chrome Operating System

Read More
Jun 17, 2009

Posted by Chris Luzader in Companies, Computers, Other News | 0 comments

Google Considers Request by Many to Increase Privacy

google logo 1024x408 Google Considers Request by Many to Increase Privacy

More than three dozen security and privacy advocates and researchers are asking Google to offer better data protection for users of Gmail and other Google apps and Google said on Tuesday that it is considering doing that, if it doesn’t slow down the apps too much.

You may not know this but you can set Gmail to encrypt your session data by default (I recommend to do it!) to protect it from being sniffed over the network. However, Google doesn’t offer the ability to encrypt potentially sensitive data created in other Google apps like Docs or Calendar by default, which means the communications could be stolen or snooped on by someone using a packet sniffer on public Internet connections, such as open wireless networks, according to the letter addressed to Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt and signed by a who’s who of 38 experts in the security industry.

Granted, users of other free e-mail services, social networks, and many other sites are vulnerable to data theft and account hijacking, the letter notes. But Google is in a position to set a standard for others to follow, it says.

Google should enable HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure), a technology used by banks and e-commerce sites, by default for Gmail, Docs and Calendar, or at least do more to educate users about the privacy risks and make it easy to turn on the HTTPS by default, the letter urges.

Not only do many people not understand the privacy risks in using unencrypted services, but they don’t know that they have the HTTPS default option and finding the settings to change isn’t that easy, the letter says. Users can access Gmail, Docs, Calendar and other apps via HTTPS by simply changing the “http://” in the URL address to “https://,” but many don’t know about that option, either. I recommend that you select the option to use HTTPS immediately (I use it!)!

“As a market leader in providing cloud services, Google has an opportunity to engage in genuine privacy and security leadership, and to set a standard for the industry,” the letter says. “If Google believes that encryption and protection from hackers is a choice that should be left up to users, the company must do a better job of informing them of the risks so that they are equipped to make this choice.”

Some of the security experts endorsing the document include Bruce Schneier, chief security technology officer of BT Group; Peter Neumann, principal scientist at SRI International; encryption pioneer Ron Rivest of MIT; Steve Bellovin of Columbia University; Eugene Spafford at Purdue University; and DEFCON founder Jeff Moss, who recently joined the Homeland Security Advisory Council.

In response, Alma Whitten, a software engineer on Google’s security and privacy teams, wrote in a blog post that Google has been “looking into whether it would make sense to turn on HTTPS as the default for all Gmail users.

“But we want to more completely understand the impact on people’s experience, analyze the data, and make sure there are no negative effects,” she wrote. “Ideally we’d like this to be on by default for all connections, and we’re investigating the trade-offs, since there are some downsides to HTTPS–in some cases it makes certain actions slower.”

Google is planning to test the use of HTTPS with “small samples of different types of Gmail users” to see whether it affects the performance of their e-mail, the blog post says.

“Unless there are negative effects on the user experience or it’s otherwise impractical, we intend to turn on HTTPS by default more broadly, hopefully for all Gmail users,” the post says. “We’re also considering how to make this work best for other apps including Google Docs and Google Calendar.”

The letter addresses the performance trade-off argument, noting that Google seems to have solved the issue because it provides access to its advertising systems and several other services only via HTTPS sessions.

“Google’s engineers have created a low-latency, enjoyable experience for users of Health, Voice, AdWords and AdSense–we are confident that these same skilled engineers can make any necessary tweaks to make Gmail, Docs, and Calendar work equally well in order to enable encryption by default,” the letter says.

So, are you going to use HTTPS by default, or just HTTP, or what? Leave your answer in the comments!

Read More
Jun 6, 2009

Posted by Keenan "SuperMario290" in Featured Articles, Gaming in General | 1 comment

Google Says Happy 25th Birthday to Tetris via Cool Image

Oh Google, how you celebrate every single event under the sun. This time, the search engine is celebrating the 25th anniversery of everyone’s favorite and most frustrating puzzle game, Tetris.

Read More
Apr 1, 2009

Posted by Keenan "SuperMario290" in Companies | 2 comments

Happy Birthday Gmail!

gmail icon Happy Birthday Gmail!

Well, Gmail is now turning 5 years old as of today. Introduced on April fools day from Google, I think that we’ve all learned that this is one thing that isn’t a joke. Hopefully we’ll have another 5 years again together.

Link

Read More
Mar 16, 2009

Posted by Keenan "SuperMario290" in Companies | 0 comments

The Pirate Bay User Pages Blocked by Google and Firefox

If in the last 24 hours, have tried to find torrents or files on The Pirate Bay via Google or the Firefox browser, you will see that certain sections of the site are being flagged as containing malware; making the worlds largest torrent tracker an “attack” site.

tpbmalware The Pirate Bay User Pages Blocked by Google and Firefox

What is the problem exactly? orrentFreak spoke with Peter Sunde (brokep) who told us that right now they don’t have a clear idea of what is causing the problem although they are working hard on fixing it. Some people are saying that this is due to malicious ads from third parties which are embedded in the site.

Hopefully The Pirate Bay fixes this, or whoever is at fault for this. No doubt with the trial out of the way, the people behind TBT will get it sorted out in no time.

Link

Read More
Page 1 of 4941234567891020...Last »